.Google's Martin Splitt responded to a concern in the search engine optimization Office Hrs podcast regarding whether recreating YouTube video information right into text on a website would certainly be viewed as duplicate satisfied and also possess a bad impact on the web page rankings.Although replicate content is actually not a negative ranking element, content published on a much more reliable internet site can easily induce the web content on the much less reliable website to become outranked. It is actually an authentic inquiry to inquire due to the fact that web content on a reliable will definitely outrank the exact same information on a much less authoritative one.Some in the hunt community describe one piece of information usurping the ranks of one more as 'cannibalization' of the website's ranking ability. This is the issue of the individual requesting the concern.Google's Martin Splitt told the provided question:." If I create a YouTube online video and then take that particular content or information and place it on a websites, could Google.com flag that web page or even web site for duplicate information?".Various Content Media Are Treated As Different.Martin Splitt responded to that the two kinds of content are actually various and also are going to certainly not be actually addressed as the exact same web content, thus releasing text web content drawn out coming from a video clip will certainly certainly not be thought about reproduce material.This is his answer:." No, one is a video clip and also the other one is actually text content, and also will be unique content!".Publishing Extracted Text From Video Recording.Martin applauded the concept of removing message web content from an online video and republishing it as message, taking note that some individuals choose to consume information in text form instead of watching a video. Switching the flow of web content from content to sound or video clip is most likely certainly not a negative idea likewise considering that some people have problem checking out text message material as well as may prefer listening to it from an online video or a podcast format.Martin discussed printing video recording information in a textual model:." It is actually additionally certainly not a poor suggestion, some customers (like me) could prefer a text message model and others could not manage to use a video clip variation of the material initially as a result of data transfer or even aesthetic constraints.".Takeaways.The suggestion behind the question is actually repurposing information and it's a really good suggestion. Explore is greater than Google, it is actually additionally YouTube and no matter where folks obtain their audio material, like Spotify. The reality that there is no cannibalization of the web content between channels creates repurposing a worthwhile approach to expanding your web content reach.Listen closely to the podcast at the 8:20 moment mark:.Featured Image by Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.